|
| related topics |
| {particle, mechanics, theory} |
| {states, state, optimal} |
| {energy, gaussian, time} |
| {observables, space, algebra} |
| {group, space, representation} |
| {time, decoherence, evolution} |
| {theory, mechanics, state} |
| {field, particle, equation} |
| {operator, operators, space} |
| {level, atom, field} |
| {spin, pulse, spins} |
| {photon, photons, single} |
| {let, theorem, proof} |
|
Comment on "How the No-Cloning Theorem Got its Name"
Alexander Yu. Vlasov
abstract: A review by A. Peres [quant-ph/0205076] appears recently. It is difficult to
add something to such kind of fundamental themes, but here is briefly presented
some ideas about challenges of the no-cloning theorem and imaginary
modifications of quantum mechanics, that could make precise cloning possible.
- oai_identifier:
- oai:arXiv.org:quant-ph/0205195
- categories:
- quant-ph
- comments:
- 3 pages, 2 col., LaTeX 2e
- arxiv_id:
- quant-ph/0205195
- created:
- 2002-05-31
Full article ▸
|
|
| related documents |
| 0108123v1 |
| 0603155v1 |
| 0501093v1 |
| 9801005v1 |
| 9706023v1 |
| 9809017v1 |
| 9704025v1 |
| 0701198v1 |
| 0406121v1 |
| 0507194v1 |
| 9908090v3 |
| 0612033v1 |
| 0105014v2 |
| 0606242v3 |
| 0507024v1 |
| 0005087v2 |
| 0502144v1 |
| 0209139v1 |
| 0104007v2 |
| 0002009v1 |
| 0406146v1 |
| 0001034v1 |
| 9811027v1 |
| 0703193v2 |
| 0007101v4 |
|