|
| related topics |
| {theory, mechanics, state} |
| {states, state, optimal} |
| {alice, bob, state} |
| {particle, mechanics, theory} |
| {key, protocol, security} |
| {light, field, probe} |
| {time, decoherence, evolution} |
| {wave, scattering, interference} |
| {level, atom, field} |
| {state, states, coherent} |
| {photon, photons, single} |
| {algorithm, log, probability} |
| {state, states, entangled} |
|
How the no-cloning theorem got its name
Asher Peres
abstract: I was the referee who approved the publication of Nick Herbert's FLASH paper,
knowing perfectly well that it was wrong. I explain why my decision was the
correct one, and I briefly review the progress to which it led.
- oai_identifier:
- oai:arXiv.org:quant-ph/0205076
- categories:
- quant-ph
- comments:
- proceedings of Quantum Interferometry IV, needs fortschritte.sty
- doi:
- 10.1002/prop.200310062
- arxiv_id:
- quant-ph/0205076
- created:
- 2002-05-14
Full article ▸
|
|
| related documents |
| 0612123v2 |
| 0503094v2 |
| 0107085v1 |
| 0110043v1 |
| 0407120v1 |
| 0307132v1 |
| 9806011v1 |
| 0406077v1 |
| 0406104v1 |
| 0210181v1 |
| 0701079v1 |
| 0205195v1 |
| 0507218v1 |
| 0205026v2 |
| 0501093v1 |
| 0103064v1 |
| 0204080v1 |
| 0507194v1 |
| 0209059v1 |
| 0603155v1 |
| 0612033v1 |
| 0606242v3 |
| 0507024v1 |
| 0502144v1 |
| 0209139v1 |
|