|
| related topics |
| {theory, mechanics, state} |
| {qubit, qubits, gate} |
| {algorithm, log, probability} |
| {energy, state, states} |
| {measurement, state, measurements} |
| {spin, pulse, spins} |
| {let, theorem, proof} |
| {observables, space, algebra} |
| {vol, operators, histories} |
| {key, protocol, security} |
| {time, systems, information} |
| {light, field, probe} |
| {states, state, optimal} |
| {cos, sin, state} |
| {trap, ion, state} |
| {state, algorithm, problem} |
|
Contact between laboratory instruments and equations of quantum mechanics
John M. Myers, F. Hadi Madjid
abstract: Ambiguity in the contact between laboratory instruments and equations of
quantum mechanics is formulated in terms of responses of the instruments to
commands transmitted to them by a Classical digital Process-control Computer
(CPC); in this way instruments are distinguished from quantum-mechanical models
(sets of equations) that specify what is desired of the instruments. Results
include: (1) a formulation of quantum mechanics adapted to computer-controlled
instruments; (2) a lower bound on the precision of unitary transforms required
for quantum searching and a lower bound on sample size needed to show that
instruments implement a desired model at that precision; (3) a lower bound on
precision of timing required of a CPC in directing instruments; (4) a
demonstration that guesswork is necessary in ratcheting up the precision of
commands.
- oai_identifier:
- oai:arXiv.org:quant-ph/0005007
- categories:
- quant-ph
- comments:
- 19 pages, prepared for SPIE AeroSense 2000
- arxiv_id:
- quant-ph/0005007
- created:
- 2000-05-01
Full article ▸
|
|
| related documents |
| 0106133v2 |
| 0411075v1 |
| 0204168v2 |
| 0112166v5 |
| 0203020v1 |
| 0210152v1 |
| 0508212v1 |
| 0611076v1 |
| 0201045v1 |
| 0112119v1 |
| 0602212v1 |
| 0204080v1 |
| 0701200v3 |
| 0110043v1 |
| 0205076v1 |
| 0210181v1 |
| 0610047v1 |
| 0406226v1 |
| 0103064v1 |
| 0610214v3 |
| 0403071v1 |
| 0104069v2 |
| 0204118v2 |
| 0503094v2 |
| 0303092v2 |
|